
Xplumberlives wrote:So whatever happens with the funding debacle, ultimately we have an asset which can't fly much in 2010 let alone attend many airshows!
I so hope I am drawing the wrong conclusion!


Gaz wrote:I'm guessing there's not much to update.
Either that or they've all buggered off


P.eames wrote:probably off to some despot country to learn how to pull off a coup!
It is a particularly nasty catch 22 situation for them to be in, one that i certainly see no way out of unless there is a fairly hefty cash injection fairly soon, I wonder at what time is the decision weather to pull the plug or not is made?

you have to talk in code or folk on the other side think we are all lottery winners and get the wrong idea








] I don't believe any paperwork was ever drawn up.

P.eames wrote:By C word i assume you mean .....COUP?




P.eames wrote:Hmmm, refraining from using that word is a good thing, such a terrible word it is.


.
.


Old Rigger wrote:Thanks Pam, I just thought I remembered some conversations I had with some of the guys before first flight and on the VTSC forum at some time in the past discussing this and there was some digging to find out if 558 had had the MOD emobodied when at St Athan on a Major servicing, it turned out they did not bother as 558 was not deemed important enough to do that before it went out of service (also the MOD had no money), but I thought some had had it done, but I will bow to those more knowledgeable as my memory is not as good as it used to be on these sort of things.
It was a mute point anyway as it is obvious that there is nothing in place for 558 from what Dr P wrote in one of those last updates, I just thought that knowing about it way back when, it would not have been left to the last minute to start organising/planning for it, oh bum just realised what I wrote there![]()
Must be time to go back to lurking it is safer, but I unfortunately ponder on something that has been said/written for a while, then think of something and cannot resist posting the odd thought, but only in the interest of trying to be proactive rather than distructive thats the problem being in Quality.


Mayfly wrote:Mick I don't think this mod was ever embodied on any Vulcans therefore although it was in the wings [excuse the pun] I don't believe any paperwork was ever drawn up.





Old Rigger wrote:Thanks sooty655, so memory not as bad as I thought, cheers again Pam your memory about this current MOD was correct.
But even with that info, that requirement was not just realised in December 09, it was known that it would be needed sometime in the future so why not drip feed tenders for the various MOD requirements. It still appears that no forward planning was done, it is all firefighting last minute pressure planning everytime, living on a knife edge and then at the last minute apply pressure to people to get things done in short order is not good for a business or for the employees health and sanity.
But no doubt someone will hopefully tell me that I have percieved the situation incorrectly and give the facts so we can all stop getting worried that we might not see 558 until later this year, if at all.
Aaargh I have done it again, must stop logging in, I am in danger of ending up in the doghouse for not being positive![]()
Have a nice day peeps, regards Mick


Old Rigger wrote:But no doubt someone will hopefully tell me that I have percieved the situation incorrectly and give the facts so we can all stop getting worried that we might not see 558 until later this year, if at all.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests