I so agree Jim. If only the Buccaneer had received the upgrades that were proposed for it.
If its oil consumption rate could have been reduced, and/or Denis Healey hadn't scrapped our, conventional, aircraft carriers, the Falklands War might never have happened. There is no way Galtieri and Co would have even considered trying to annexe the Falklands if we still had proper carriers carrying Buccs and F4s.
Now that we don't have any aircraft carriers or any aircraft capable of reaching the Falklands, ( the Typhoons were taken there in the hold of a Russian An-124 )
I won't even mention in-flight refuelling

It would be down to 7 VC10s
The Argie politicians are , once again, trying to divert attention away from their incompetence by threatening the Falklands. Their 'woman' in charge really has it in for the Falklanders.
So what do we have that could reach the Falklands today? We have no carriers of
any description. No Harriers. The Tiffies have to be air-freighted there by friendly Russian contractors

We have no AEW capability - no Sentries or Nimrods !! No Vulcans, No F3 Tornados. Our Army , apparently, no longer officially qualifies as an ARMY, it is a Defence Force as it is too small.!
The Royal Navy would struggle to reach Normandy these days so the Falklands is well outside any of their Risk Scenarios. They can't even handle amateur Somali 'Pirates' without looking like rejects from a 'Carry On' film crew.
My Christmas and New Year message to the 'Bennies' is - learn Spanish.... pronto.
Tongue firmly in cheek.....
ibw