



Gully wrote:
<snip>
2. The Club Committee has a responsibility to both members and the aircraft (completely clear in the constitution), with the latter support applying equally to '558's flying days and in subsequent 'retirement'. However, what the Club does not have is any influence or control over the destiny of '558 should the Trust go into administration / receivership, nor do we have any influence over '558's eventual resting place if the Trust continues to operate her until the end of her flying life is reached. Any suggestion that we do have any rights or powers is erroneous.
<snip>
Gully


Checkflaps wrote:How nice to have a sensible discussion allowing everyone to have a viewpoint
G


Jigsaw wrote:Checkflaps wrote:How nice to have a sensible discussion allowing everyone to have a viewpoint
G
CF, Iconic is full of Mass Debators mate. Long may it continue




Mayfly wrote:and all with humour too!!!!


Xplumberlives wrote:Well he is the biggest mass debator in here!


Mayfly wrote:Sooty655 wrote:Mayfly wrote:Sooty can you tell us who told you she isn't going to China? ...........
Sorry, I couldn't possibly reveal my (sweet and sour) sauces.
Some how I think Sooty just isn't taking this seriously![]()


Xplumberlives wrote:Well he is the biggest mass debator in here!












Mayfly wrote:and all with humour too!!!!


Checkflaps wrote:In my mind, it is funny how one aircraft can generate so much 'passion' in people. Having looked around the other forums. there is no other aircraft that generates as much discussion as XH558 - and then by some margin.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests