It doesn't matter what you make or how good it is, it will not be able to compete against hugh Government backed companies like Boeing, they will always undercut, it's just business.





Za150 wrote:As DB said, no matter how good the A400 may be, its never to compete with the already in service proved C17 and C130's





Dan4th wrote:Just a side-note, Boeing isn't subsidized and
receives no tax breaks. The uproar over the
Aeroboose Tankers included Boeing but was
largely Senators and Reps from the states
where the affected jobs were located. A bit
ironic as a big chunk of the Airbus's parts and
assemblies are from US suppliers....Jury still
out on this issue, btw.
Danf.






another step closer!

Mackrick wrote:Article courtesy of Flight Global.![]()
© Marshall Aerospace


Saracenman wrote::ymapplause: another step closer!
any idea what happens to ex-Snoopy Herc? kept as a future testbed or scrapped?
sm














Saracenman wrote:looks like you're on that sloping runway again!


Bubbles wrote:Saracenman wrote::ymapplause: another step closer!
any idea what happens to ex-Snoopy Herc? kept as a future testbed or scrapped?
sm
Scrapped i'm afraid.







Bubbles wrote:Heres hopeing they do. Shame to see old Snoopy go.
PLEEEEEEEEEEEASE download and install spellcheck Bubbs - http://download.chip.eu/en/ieSpell-2.4.0_169355.html


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests