victor whoopsie

All military (past & present) aircraft talk, photos, videos etc

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Nacluv » Wed May 06, 2009 9:32 pm

Nice Victory wave !!
I was there. Whooosh!
User avatar
Nacluv
Piper J-3 Cub
Piper J-3 Cub
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: Shropshire
Also Known As: Big D

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Jigsaw » Thu May 07, 2009 9:33 pm

Dougs wrote:that will be fantastic if its true however the victor operators need to revise their 'display' i think they have been very lucky i for one dont want to see victor parts all over bruntingthorpe air field she looks much better in one piece ;)


I think it is more likely they need a throttle man that knows the difference between forward and back. I am sure somebody will correct me if I am wrong but the way I understand it for a fast taxi run (Mayfly HELP)
Sufficient power is applied to take the aircraft almost to the speed required for take off. Before this speed is reached, the throttles are cut. This produces enough speed to get the nose wheel off the ground momentarily.
It looks more to me that power was added rather than removed.

Prepared to be shot down in flames :D

I really wish I could have been there though :(( . I have seen Victors take off and land, display etc hundreds of times. I have even seen one go off the end of the runway into a field and another burst into flames as it powered up for take off :( . Such a beauty of an aircraft imo.

An interesting sight below (I like it). This page is victors but there are also Vulcans etc if you care to look around the site.

http://www.users.waitrose.com/~g8jan/ht ... m%201.html
Kev
User avatar
Jigsaw
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
 
Posts: 6456
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Scunthorpe
Also Known As: photo_lincs

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Bovril » Thu May 07, 2009 9:56 pm

i believe you are corrrect.. im sure 655 is taken to full power to achieve max speed (achieved in 5seconds), the power then cut and the nose lifted for a roll out to stop

people on other forums have said we didnt lift the nose in 2008 because of a technical issue.. 655 was fine... it was the crew that made the call on what the plane is going to do (as they always do, they drive, we fix), so in 2008 because of high wind speeds, direction etc they kept her nose on the floor.

infact fuel was moved forward to make the CofG such that she was nose heavy.
Last edited by Bovril on Thu May 07, 2009 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
XM655 - the most powerful vulcan in the world
[Alive and Kicking]
User avatar
Bovril
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: great malvern

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Dougs » Thu May 07, 2009 11:05 pm

now thats the type of aircraft husbandry i was refering to! much better to take the safe option than risk lives and rare aircraft for a quick 'thrill' top marks DT and crew and look forward to many years of fast runs!

what i was refering to (revise their display) on an observation note
no.1 flaps were set on the victor why no need for a non takeoff run
no.2 why lift the front at all on a victor (which is also 1/2 mile away from the crowd at the time) which has no need to do a wheelie like the vulcan
both (particually the last point ) would probably have stopped the 'flight of the phenix' and saved a perfectly good pair of undies :-o
B-)
User avatar
Dougs
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: coalville leicestershire
Also Known As: Avro Atlantic

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Mayfly » Fri May 08, 2009 7:05 am

the crew made the decision at 8 in the morning based on weather at the time & weather forecast for the afternoon, simply to avoid any last minute pressure or change of plans.........
In memory of a very dear friend - Mike Pearson

Very fond memories of Robbie Gilvary - DTs 1st Vulcan Captain who taught DT all he knew.
User avatar
Mayfly
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 29760
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: Bomber County

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Gully » Fri May 08, 2009 11:18 am

I think it will take time to know the proper facts as to what happened with the Victor on Sunday. At the moment there's plenty of (inevitable) speculation and chatter on various forums, much of which is no doubt ill-informed and unhelpful to those involved ;). As far as I'm aware, the "throttles rumour" is exactly that, but people are beginning to state it and accept it as fact [-x .

Personally, I'm not prepared to offer an opinion or pass judgement when I'm neither qualified to do so nor in the possession of the facts to inform my position.

Gully
Last edited by Gully on Fri May 08, 2009 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aircraft - The Greatest Gigs in the Sky!
User avatar
Gully
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Hitchin, Herts.

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Dougs » Fri May 08, 2009 12:43 pm

well said! i would not want to speculate as to the cause either, just mentioned extenuating evidence which might contribute to the same type of outcome.
on a lighter note the victor crew would definitely pass muster with a certain Irish airline i have to reluctantly fly with the landing is very reminiscent to their 'standard landing technique' ;)
B-)
User avatar
Dougs
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: coalville leicestershire
Also Known As: Avro Atlantic

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Crew chief » Fri May 08, 2009 4:40 pm

Hi all.

As my friend Bovril has stated XM655 is taken up to full power for her fast taxi.Full power is used for about 5 seconds at which point the throttles are closed and IF the conditions are right then Dave will lift the nose.Ask any of our ground or aircrew what comes first and they will all say the word SAFETY.
Hope to see you all on June 21st.
I only do it with a long lead.
User avatar
Crew chief
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:27 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Bovril » Fri May 08, 2009 5:16 pm

we all love the vulcan, but we all know she is not a big boys toy, these planes have teeth and will kill if not treated with the respect they deserve

Crew chief wrote:Hi all.

As my friend Bovril has stated XM655 is taken up to full power for her fast taxi.Full power is used for about 5 seconds at which point the throttles are closed and IF the conditions are right then Dave will lift the nose.Ask any of our ground or aircrew what comes first and they will all say the word SAFETY.
Hope to see you all on June 21st.
XM655 - the most powerful vulcan in the world
[Alive and Kicking]
User avatar
Bovril
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: great malvern

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Saracenman » Fri May 08, 2009 6:33 pm

i've just found these pics posted by IanF on UKAR........

:-o

Image

Image

Image

Image

:-o

sm
Lunchtime! ImageImage
User avatar
Saracenman
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
 
Posts: 12047
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:17 pm
Location: Away from Cats
Also Known As: Nobody

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Bovril » Fri May 08, 2009 9:56 pm

30 feet?
XM655 - the most powerful vulcan in the world
[Alive and Kicking]
User avatar
Bovril
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: great malvern

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Saracenman » Fri May 08, 2009 10:02 pm

well a Victor tail stands about as high as a VC10 tail does it not? that's 40ft from the floor and, in some of the pics I've seen, you could slide 1½ Victors underneath!

sm
Lunchtime! ImageImage
User avatar
Saracenman
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
 
Posts: 12047
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:17 pm
Location: Away from Cats
Also Known As: Nobody

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Spitfire » Fri May 08, 2009 11:14 pm

That's some REALLY fast taxi :-o :-o :-o :-o

Excellent pics too :D :D
User avatar
Spitfire
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
 
Posts: 5207
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Hayle, SW Cornwall

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Spad » Fri May 08, 2009 11:20 pm

I think a Victor tailplane bullet fairing is around 22~23 feet off the ground. That last pic by SM would suggest that 30 feet is a reasonable estimate - IMO...
Should have thought a VC-10 stands way higher.

cheers
Rick
User avatar
Spad
Piper J-3 Cub
Piper J-3 Cub
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: N. Wilts

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Dougs » Sat May 09, 2009 10:08 pm

well i think wilber wright would be happy with that effort!
;)
B-)
User avatar
Dougs
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: coalville leicestershire
Also Known As: Avro Atlantic

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Jigsaw » Sun May 10, 2009 11:32 am

Dougs wrote:well i think wilber wright would be happy with that effort!
;)


LMAO, I think you may be right mate :))

Thanks for posting the pics SM.
Kev
User avatar
Jigsaw
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
 
Posts: 6456
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Scunthorpe
Also Known As: photo_lincs

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Dan4th » Sun May 10, 2009 12:39 pm

Thanks!

I now have in my head a comedy sketch of
Orville and Wilbur at Kitty Hawk on that
fateful day but with an FAA Compliance
Officer in attendance!!!!!

"Nope! Sorry, boys, but 'yer paperwork's all
Screwed UP! This crate ain't goin' NOWHERE!"

Dan4th
I like to do my planning retroactively!
User avatar
Dan4th
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
 
Posts: 14733
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Bangor, Maine, USA
Also Known As: Token Murkin

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Sooty655 » Mon May 11, 2009 8:53 pm

One small correction to the information given in this thread by my esteemed colleagues. On a fast taxi, XM655 uses maximum CRUISE power. We leave the limiters in cruise rather than take off out of respect for the engines, which are nearly as old as me (but not quite as knackered).

Sooty
Sooty

One Olympus 301 has twice the power of a complete F1 starting grid.
XM655 has four of them, all serviceable.
When we make noise, WE MAKE NOIZE ! !
User avatar
Sooty655
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 8871
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:17 pm
Location: Weedon, Northants

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Bovril » Mon May 11, 2009 9:18 pm

Sooty655 wrote:One small correction to the information given in this thread by my esteemed colleagues. On a fast taxi, XM655 uses maximum CRUISE power. We leave the limiters in cruise rather than take off out of respect for the engines, which are nearly as old as me (but not quite as knackered).

Sooty

:ymhug: :-@ :-@ :-@ :-@ :-@ :-@ :-@
XM655 - the most powerful vulcan in the world
[Alive and Kicking]
User avatar
Bovril
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: great malvern

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Dougs » Tue May 12, 2009 7:49 am

how much is that (%)???? :)
B-)
User avatar
Dougs
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 4:20 pm
Location: coalville leicestershire
Also Known As: Avro Atlantic

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Bovril » Tue May 12, 2009 7:52 am

if you have any technical questions on the engines etc, then sotty655.. will be the man to ask :D
XM655 - the most powerful vulcan in the world
[Alive and Kicking]
User avatar
Bovril
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: great malvern

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Sooty655 » Tue May 12, 2009 9:09 am

The limiter is a double datum governor in the fuel pump driven by the LP compressor. The cruise setting limits LP speed to 96%. That would be somewhere around 15,000 lbs thrust.
The take off setting in service was set to 100%, which gave 18,000 lbs thrust, to match aircraft with 200 series engines and maximise engine life.
The absolute maximum for a 300, intended for use with Skybolt, was 104% which equated to 20,000 lbs thrust.

Sooty

PS all the above are from memory as I haven't got access to the library at the moment (I'm down to 4mph on a canal boat) so if you find different figures, don't shout too loud.
Sooty

One Olympus 301 has twice the power of a complete F1 starting grid.
XM655 has four of them, all serviceable.
When we make noise, WE MAKE NOIZE ! !
User avatar
Sooty655
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 8871
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:17 pm
Location: Weedon, Northants

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Crew chief » Tue May 12, 2009 8:35 pm

We do try and lookafter 655 as best we can as she is the only live 300 series engined Vulcan on the planet.Even at cruise power she goes like a scalded cat and will reach 90 knots in a matter of seconds.
I only do it with a long lead.
User avatar
Crew chief
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:27 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Saracenman » Thu May 14, 2009 8:03 pm

just found this on airliners.net - the clearest yet i think...

Image

:-o
Lunchtime! ImageImage
User avatar
Saracenman
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
 
Posts: 12047
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:17 pm
Location: Away from Cats
Also Known As: Nobody

Re: victor whoopsie

Postby Jigsaw » Thu May 14, 2009 8:12 pm

Now THAT is one F'in awesome pic mate. Thanks SM :D

edit: call me daft but It also gives me a nostalgic feeling that is rather unpleasant. I saw those things taking off and landing for years and know I won't see it again. Makes me somewhat sad.
Kev
User avatar
Jigsaw
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
 
Posts: 6456
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Scunthorpe
Also Known As: photo_lincs

PreviousNext

Return to Military Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests