More photos later .....





Sooty655 wrote:Wonderful pics as always, Mackrick.![]()
![]()
One of them seems to have gone missing. Was it not up to your exacting standards?


PhantomAviator wrote:Sooty655 wrote:Wonderful pics as always, Mackrick.![]()
![]()
One of them seems to have gone missing. Was it not up to your exacting standards?
Same thing on the Lyneham one as well Sooty655.
I think he may be going barefoot at present.


Sooty655 wrote:PhantomAviator wrote:Sooty655 wrote:Wonderful pics as always, Mackrick.![]()
![]()
One of them seems to have gone missing. Was it not up to your exacting standards?
Same thing on the Lyneham one as well Sooty655.
I think he may be going barefoot at present.
You misunderstand me, PA.
The pic I refer to was posted and then removed.



Xplumberlives wrote:If a moderator edits a post it doesn't show like it does when us mere mortals make amendments!

Xplumberlives wrote:If a moderator edits a post it doesn't show like it does when us mere mortals make amendments!




Spitfire wrote:This is bemusing ... why would there be what I can ony take as a 'No Step' marker (the crossed out footprint) at that particular place - who would - or even could - want to try and stand on the side of the fuselage below the fin![]()
![]()
![]()
You'd have to be weightless in which case it wouldn't matter![]()

Sooty655 wrote:Xplumberlives wrote:If a moderator edits a post it doesn't show like it does when us mere mortals make amendments!
Not exactly, Xpl.
I think the edit record is only displayed if the edit is made AFTER there has been a subsequent post, whether the editor is a moderator or the original poster or both. I'm sure Wedgy will correct if that is wrong.
















Bovril wrote:i think there should be a duct on close by on the port side, i assume it to say not to use it as toe hold

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests