



such a shame


Cluny wrote:MR2's have already gone with those not allocated to museums being chopped up already , R1's go in March/April with 2 allocated for museums [Duxford and East Midlands Aeropark] and the final 1's destination is uncertain [was allocated for Newark Air Museum but they can no longer afford her] IIRC .




Xplumberlives wrote:I would think that the MR4s will be offered for sale, with a little conversion work, they would make good airliners!



Xplumberlives wrote:I would think that the MR4s will be offered for sale, with a little conversion work, they would make good airliners!



Sploosher wrote:Cluny wrote:MR2's have already gone with those not allocated to museums being chopped up already , R1's go in March/April with 2 allocated for museums [Duxford and East Midlands Aeropark] and the final 1's destination is uncertain [was allocated for Newark Air Museum but they can no longer afford her] IIRC .
I dont think they would ahve the room to park her.................![]()
Unless they have bought more land since I was there last..........


Mayfly wrote:Sploosher wrote:Cluny wrote:MR2's have already gone with those not allocated to museums being chopped up already , R1's go in March/April with 2 allocated for museums [Duxford and East Midlands Aeropark] and the final 1's destination is uncertain [was allocated for Newark Air Museum but they can no longer afford her] IIRC .
I dont think they would ahve the room to park her.................![]()
Unless they have bought more land since I was there last..........
There were rumours that NAM were either moving next door or buying/leasing more ground next door. I also read they explained it wasn't just about not affording to purchase her, it was also about not being able to source spares to replace the bit the RAF would take out.
As for scraping the MRA4s it wouldn't surprise me, if not fit for purpose how can you sell them on? [not that I am aware if the problems have been fixed or not, depends on which report you read]







Lucas1860 wrote:More or less brand new, this country is s*@te, the money spent so far should prohibit this happening.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Xplumberlives wrote:Lucas1860 wrote:More or less brand new, this country is s*@te, the money spent so far should prohibit this happening.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Calm down, something had to give and it was at least 8 years late and vastly over budget!
ALL new contracts should have time limits and fixed prices agreed before signing!


Sploosher wrote:Xplumberlives wrote:Lucas1860 wrote:More or less brand new, this country is s*@te, the money spent so far should prohibit this happening.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Calm down, something had to give and it was at least 8 years late and vastly over budget!
ALL new contracts should have time limits and fixed prices agreed before signing!
Sounds like Michael Winner![]()
![]()
![]()
Its hard to remain calm when your country is being thrown to the scrap heap, opening doors for tin pot dictators to take over the world..............


Xplumberlives wrote:Sploosher wrote:Xplumberlives wrote:Lucas1860 wrote:More or less brand new, this country is s*@te, the money spent so far should prohibit this happening.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Calm down, something had to give and it was at least 8 years late and vastly over budget!
ALL new contracts should have time limits and fixed prices agreed before signing!
Sounds like Michael Winner![]()
![]()
![]()
Its hard to remain calm when your country is being thrown to the scrap heap, opening doors for tin pot dictators to take over the world..............
Are you applying for the job?








Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests