

Bubbles wrote:After reading this thread which pretty much rehashes whats been said on the other forum at one point or another theres one thing that puzzles me, and thats why would JinR be posting as someone else ? Makes no sense to me at all. To be honest i think theres a little bit of conspiracy theoryitus creeping in. And regarding the comment made about how long the "other" forum will last, not long is the answer if everyones jumping ship.


RLN wrote:Bubbles wrote:After reading this thread which pretty much rehashes whats been said on the other forum at one point or another theres one thing that puzzles me, and thats why would JinR be posting as someone else ? Makes no sense to me at all. To be honest i think theres a little bit of conspiracy theoryitus creeping in. And regarding the comment made about how long the "other" forum will last, not long is the answer if everyones jumping ship.
I agree about JinR, his style seemed familiar, that's all. Anyway, I thought forums were the breeding ground of conspiracy theories - no definitive info. breeds gossip. I don't think anyone is jumping ship, and if they were the few on this forum won't make any difference, but maybe the several thousand members of TVOC (or whatever it's called - can't remember) who don't use the forum could make a difference.
If this thread is rehashing what has been said on TVOC, don't you think that "What is a shame though is seeing this forum being bad mouthed elsewhere by its own members" is a bit dramatic and inflammatory? Unless, of course, I am wrong and you are not referring to this forum.








Saracenman wrote:is it just me who's a little confused here?![]()
who is accused of bad-mouthing which forum? when and where did this occur?
overall, whatever has occurred, this issue surely shouldn't be what who said when or where, or whether it's been said countless times before or not; isn't the real issue to do with 558/VTST/TVOC/VTSC etc?
it strikes me that any recent 'gripe' that has been voiced before (be it here, on TVOC forum or elsewhere) clearly demonstrates that a) the specific 'problem' is an existing one and b) it should've been solved long ago, negating any need for continued 'moaning'
it's surely very simple isn't it? to stop the 'moaning', correct the problems that are moaned about!![]()
sm






RLN wrote:Bubbles wrote:After reading this thread which pretty much rehashes whats been said on the other forum at one point or another theres one thing that puzzles me, and thats why would JinR be posting as someone else ? Makes no sense to me at all. To be honest i think theres a little bit of conspiracy theoryitus creeping in. And regarding the comment made about how long the "other" forum will last, not long is the answer if everyones jumping ship.
I agree about JinR, his style seemed familiar, that's all. Anyway, I thought forums were the breeding ground of conspiracy theories - no definitive info. breeds gossip. I don't think anyone is jumping ship, and if they were the few on this forum won't make any difference, but maybe the several thousand members of TVOC (or whatever it's called - can't remember) who don't use the forum could make a difference.
If this thread is rehashing what has been said on TVOC, don't you think that "What is a shame though is seeing this forum being bad mouthed elsewhere by its own members" is a bit dramatic and inflammatory? Unless, of course, I am wrong and you are not referring to this forum.












Saracenman wrote:it's all too easy to get the wrong end of the stick when simply reading the 'written' word from a screen, and i think you have summed things up rather well CG.
even so, whilst certain aspects of TVOC's actions have changed, i still fear that many worrying fundamentals haven't. i can't help thinking that things such as the [more] regular updates on the homepage, for example, are done merely because we will 'moan' otherwise.
many of us are only too aware of the views of some of the TVOC employees toward the Club and its members - it's THIS that needs change, along with several other major attitudes, rather than the superficial issues. that's not to belittle what has been bettered at long last- we're finally getting there - but perhaps it's a case of closing the stable door after the horse has buggered off?
does 558 have the necessary funds to see the project survive long enough for other changes to take effect?![]()
sm


Bubbles wrote:Im not about to name names etc as to who has been slagging the forum off, hopefully the person(s) responsible will maybe think about thier actions and realise that members of the T.V.O.C. also frequent other forums. The comments made by this person were not about specific areas of the forum but the forum in general and as the forum is only as good as its members i was offended to read the comments, more so when the poster is posting on the T.V.O.C. all nicey nicey to everyone.
Now i have the same concerns etc that i have had for ages they havnt gone away but what i have learnt is that the constant barracking of whatever the hell they are called isnt going to make the slightest bit of diffrence and doing it on here is going to make even less of a diffrence, do what i and others are doing and actually get off arses and make changes, might not happen over night but its better than sitting around shouting into a vacum isnt it?
Oh and it would be nice if you would comment and disect my posts on the actuall forum i posted on






I think this forum has given a many of us chance to let off a bit of steam. Sometimes you need to after feeling like you're banging you head against a brick wall. But we're fighting on for '558. I am a realist, but I'm also an optimist and I believe that one way or another we will succeed.
Mackrick wrote:Free Speech I'm all for it ...




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests