


Hazzer111 wrote:Couldn't the engines be sent to Rolls Royce to be refurbished?


Ray C wrote:I'm looking at the situation from a classic/historic car point of view, yes I know they don't take to the air, however, many old cars out there have none original upgrades/replacements.
Brakes, steering, complete engines, suspension, all that the public see is the original body, I drove an MGC GT Sebring replica 0-60 in 7.5 seconds bloody awesome, public comments, ahhhhh what a nice old car.
Anyway I'm off to the pub for a few beers.





Dee wrote:I think if she stops flying next year as is suggested many people will stop donating,, simple! But reading DB's post surely its best to highlight this mod now so as to keep her up there^^^^^^. Thats where i want to see her for more years yet please!!!![]()


Jack wrote:Scampton would be a good bet.



Sooty655 wrote:I think she will end up wherever she happens to be when she needs a non-available engine.
Followed by months of bitching about how unfair it is to be refused permission for a three-engined ferry flight.
It really is just not worth responding to that!! Stuff it, I have more than enough to do supporting a FLYING Vulcan to bandy words with you. In future find your own answers, you've done my head in.

Sploosher wrote:Xplumberlives wrote:I know where she will end her days!
Elvington......................


Sooty655 wrote:Not judgmental at all, and not intended to be. Simply my opinion (no more than that, hence the "I think..." opening) based on the risk that at some point a birdstrike may take out two engines, the lack of unlimited quantities of available spare engines (which isn't likely to get any better), the understandable caution shown by the CAA with regard to XH558, and the established track record in bitchiness shown in the past by some supporters of XH558.
I'm not sure why you are so hostile, unless you are suggesting that XH558 will definitely cease to fly when there is only one spare engine available. If that is the case, it would make a cost-benefit analysis of the FI mod (which you have previously referred to) somewhat eye-watering.



Ducati Boy wrote:You are obviously not a supporter of 558 and seem to relish the prospect of TVOC failing, that is your misfortune, one has to wonder if perhaps have a personal axe to grind against the project or those involved.

Sploosher wrote:Xplumberlives wrote:I know where she will end her days!
Elvington......................




Xplumberlives wrote:No, NOT Southend!




Xplumberlives wrote:Yep, waiting and watching, some time in late 2013 if Dr Bob is correct!

Phantom2 wrote:Xplumberlives wrote:No, NOT Southend!
Wait and see![]()
down south.................





Hazzer111 wrote:somewhere on the website it said xh558 would be flying for at least the next 10 years, this isn't good if they are saying next year will be the end, and anyway we already have taxing Vulcan's.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests