The CAA's take on a few topics (558, TFC and naughty Tina). An interesting read.
http://key.aero/view_feature.asp?ID=35& ... on=airshow

Edit: pour gramer or is it semanticks?.






Saracenman wrote:i was sent that earlier today - very interesting reading, particularly the bit about the 558 Permit fiasco!![]()
sm




RLN wrote:And he doesn't say no to a Lightning flying in this country.




Good answers to questions we've all had in our minds - enjoyed that 

Bubbles wrote:RLN wrote:And he doesn't say no to a Lightning flying in this country.
No, but the various owners, Bae, Rolls Royce say no to one flying. I think recent events have shown why the decision not to fly them is a good one.





they always seem to hide them when ever I go past 

Hihonyr8811 wrote:That really was interesting, especially the bit about the Fighter Collection.
I'd love to see a Jag fly again, especially one of the snazzy black ones at Cranwell![]()
I don't have any pics sadlythey always seem to hide them when ever I go past =))

).
Hihonyr8811 wrote:Sorry what is this phone that you speak of (I havn't seen mine for weeks![]()
).




Hihonyr8811 wrote:Woo hoo![]()
![]()







Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests