Now you all know my ideas on art - controversial - but MY ideas .... so it wont surprise you that those opinions stray into appreciation of Marks of Spitfire ... to me the Spitfire shape in form and elegance is a total masterpiece of the designers art...... Mitchell was a genius ......
I know all the stories about the Hurricane being the work horse - and it shot down more planes - and I know that Douglas Bader himself considered the Hurricane a better gun platform having its Brownings closer together not spread like in a Spitfire's wing - but just look at that shape - elegance - beauty - ability - fit for purpose .... all in one design
It also has the remarkable pedigree of marks that saw it double in speed - develop and change - improve and stay one step ahead but all the time retaining its overall shape and design.
BUT - and here's the controversy - I hate the extended pointed wing tips of the high level marks - I hate the clipped wings of the low level marks - I hate the bubble canopies of the later marks with the reduced rear fuselage shape - and I don't like pointed fins
I just love the original design shape - to me the Mark VB [eliptical wing] (above)...
and the Mark IX
are just brilliant
And the sound of a Merlin on full chat
I was at Duxford when they got 21 in the air for Bader's Big Wing - my how I cried that day ... they came by in 4s and 3s - just wave after wave at low level .... brilliant
I've never ever touched a Spitfire let alone sat in one.... and - it would be the joy of my life to just sit in one
So what do you say about this brilliant aircraft ...... pics - stories - ideas - opinions - anything

Oh and I'm going to get all TVOC about this thread - JUST Spitfires - NO OT - NO Hurricanes - Its
THE SPITFIRE









*Ducks for cover*









Only the female of the species could say such hurtful things about an ICON! 










