



Spitfire wrote:On a bog standard laptop I have to say it looks fake too - almost photoshopped - it just isn't ... right![]()
Can't explain it - it's just too perfect .... unless its just a bloody good lucky photo



Saracenman wrote:Spitfire wrote:On a bog standard laptop I have to say it looks fake too - almost photoshopped - it just isn't ... right![]()
Can't explain it - it's just too perfect .... unless its just a bloody good lucky photo
i haven't seen any reference to © Damian Burke




I was admiring the machine, not the background 



From cockpit comfort, to sophisticated aerodynamics that gave it a performance well ahead of the Tin whatsit thing....were the mega-millions well spent? Could we raise such a sum and capitalise on the Triangle experience?



Bovril wrote:whats the damage to the victor?

Sooty655 wrote:The limiter is a double datum governor in the fuel pump driven by the LP compressor. The cruise setting limits LP speed to 96%. That would be somewhere around 15,000 lbs thrust.
The take off setting in service was set to 100%, which gave 18,000 lbs thrust, to match aircraft with 200 series engines and maximise engine life.
The absolute maximum for a 300, intended for use with Skybolt, was 104% which equated to 20,000 lbs thrust.
Sooty
PS all the above are from memory as I haven't got access to the library at the moment (I'm down to 4mph on a canal boat) so if you find different figures, don't shout too loud.


I'm not certain, but I think the Take off limiters were put back to 20000 lbs thrust for Black Buck.
With the rev limiter set to 100%, I doubt if the JPT limiter would be reached on a 301 unless operating in high ambient temperatures.
Not too far off from memory, eh?


Gaz wrote:I've got the digital artist I use to have a look at it.
I'll have an answer and proof within a couple of days.
PS: at first glance, she thinks its fake
EDIT: No layers to separate. It's authentic
In which case, Cracking find SM!!



IanM wrote:Gaz wrote:I've got the digital artist I use to have a look at it.
I'll have an answer and proof within a couple of days.
PS: at first glance, she thinks its fake
EDIT: No layers to separate. It's authentic
In which case, Cracking find SM!!
Not meaning to state the obvious but you will never find layers on a jpeg file anyway

Gaz wrote:IanM wrote:Gaz wrote:I've got the digital artist I use to have a look at it.
I'll have an answer and proof within a couple of days.
PS: at first glance, she thinks its fake
EDIT: No layers to separate. It's authentic
In which case, Cracking find SM!!
Not meaning to state the obvious but you will never find layers on a jpeg file anyway
I have no idea what you just said. I'm just repeating what my colleague said. She does forensic work on photographs, she knows what she's doing



not that I would agree thousands were there!!!!!
Mayfly wrote:http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/news/Probe-launched-10-second-Victor-flight/article-1003711-detail/article.html
hmmmnot I would agree thousands were there!!!!!








Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests