Nimrod review to reveal failures

All military (past & present) aircraft talk, photos, videos etc

Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Mackrick » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:57 am

An independent review into a fatal Nimrod crash in Afghanistan is expected to criticise air safety procedures.

Charles Haddon-Cave QC will present his findings on the 2006 explosion of the spy plane, which killed 14 servicemen.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8329117.stm
Duc, sequere, aut de via decede
User avatar
Mackrick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 9429
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: Doncaster South Yorkshire

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Xplumberlives » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:16 am

No doubt the bean counters will attempt to put the blame on the poor sods that worked on it prior to the crash!
"All modern aircraft have 4 dimensions: span, length, height and politics.
TSR-2 simply got the first 3 right. ”
— Sir Sydney Camm
User avatar
Xplumberlives
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
 
Posts: 41162
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: Close to a former Harrier Airfield
Also Known As: ROCKETMAN

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Iggie » Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:55 pm

Report criticised both the MOD and the manufacturers for shortcomings:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8329117.stm
The past is our history; it dictates our future.....
User avatar
Iggie
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
Boeing B-29 Superfortress
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: Winslow
Also Known As: iggie

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Mayfly » Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:08 pm

from what I've heard it was a much harsher worded report than anyone really expected
In memory of a very dear friend - Mike Pearson

Very fond memories of Robbie Gilvary - DTs 1st Vulcan Captain who taught DT all he knew.
User avatar
Mayfly
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 29760
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: Bomber County

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Xplumberlives » Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:09 pm

Mayfly wrote:from what I've heard it was a much harsher worded report than anyone really expected



GOOD I hope the truth is outed!
"All modern aircraft have 4 dimensions: span, length, height and politics.
TSR-2 simply got the first 3 right. ”
— Sir Sydney Camm
User avatar
Xplumberlives
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
 
Posts: 41162
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: Close to a former Harrier Airfield
Also Known As: ROCKETMAN

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Saracenman » Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:17 pm

and i hope it highlights the funding shortages! X(
Lunchtime! ImageImage
User avatar
Saracenman
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
Boeing B-52 Stratofortress
 
Posts: 12047
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:17 pm
Location: Away from Cats
Also Known As: Nobody

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Mackrick » Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:27 pm

Named and shamed.
Duc, sequere, aut de via decede
User avatar
Mackrick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 9429
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: Doncaster South Yorkshire

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Gully » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:56 pm

See what people mean about the strong wording! Just starting to read it, but here's an early excerpt:

Unfortunately, the Nimrod Safety Case was a lamentable job from start to finish. It was riddled
with errors. It missed the key dangers. Its production is a story of incompetence, complacency, and
cynicism. The best opportunity to prevent the accident to XV230 was, tragically, lost.


Gully
Aircraft - The Greatest Gigs in the Sky!
User avatar
Gully
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
 
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Hitchin, Herts.

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Mackrick » Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:23 am

Article from Flight Global on the response so far....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/10/29/334176/mod-responds-to-damning-report-into-loss-of-nimrod-xv230.html

Responding to the report on 28 October, defence secretary Bob Ainsworth said: "Based on the steps we have taken, I am certain the Nimrod remains safe to fly." The MoD will consider the report's recommendations and make a full reply by year-end, he adds. However, it has already acted by creating the new post of defence chief airworthiness engineer, who it says will be responsible "for assuring the airworthiness of our aircraft".

Separately, the MoD has announced its intention to award BAE contracts to dispose of the RAF's remaining Nimrod MR2s and three Nimrod R1 electronic intelligence aircraft, and to provide in-service support for its new fleet of nine Nimrod MRA4s.

The support deal for the MRA4 should be signed next February, with the agreement's planned first three phases to cover the type's initial 11 years of use. Operations with the MR2 will cease by 31 March 2011.
Duc, sequere, aut de via decede
User avatar
Mackrick
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 9429
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: Doncaster South Yorkshire

Re: Nimrod review to reveal failures

Postby Xplumberlives » Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:27 am

So let's see some members of the Government regularly flying in MR2s!
"All modern aircraft have 4 dimensions: span, length, height and politics.
TSR-2 simply got the first 3 right. ”
— Sir Sydney Camm
User avatar
Xplumberlives
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress
 
Posts: 41162
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: Close to a former Harrier Airfield
Also Known As: ROCKETMAN


Return to Military Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests