Gnat crashes at Car Fest

Stories and general aviation chat

Gnat crashes at Car Fest

Postby Spitfire » Sun Aug 02, 2015 11:49 pm

Kevin Whyman sadly lost his life when his Gnat crashed during a display at Car Fest :(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-33748256

Makes you wonder wether 'bang seats' should be allowed and properly maintained in privately owned small fast jets as this may have saved him ...

A bad weekend for crashes ... what with this, Blackbushe & Biggin Hill :(
User avatar
Spitfire
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
 
Posts: 5188
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Hayle, SW Cornwall

Re: Gnat crashes at Car Fest

Postby Ray C » Mon Aug 03, 2015 7:41 am

So the Hunters & Like currently flying have no ejector seats in them.....?
Be yourself...everyone else is taken...!
Oscar Wilde.
User avatar
Ray C
BAE Hawk
BAE Hawk
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:31 pm
Location: Almost in sight of the Vulcan birthplace
Also Known As: Castle boy

Re: Gnat crashes at Car Fest

Postby Vulcan Bomber » Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:22 pm

Job to say really, 558 has live seats so it's not like civvy owned aircraft can't have them.
User avatar
Vulcan Bomber
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:19 pm
Location: The home of Whittle's engine.

Re: Gnat crashes at Car Fest

Postby Spitfire » Mon Aug 03, 2015 11:33 pm

It seems I made an incorrect assumption - we all know what assume does ;)

I read an article recently about the bang seat in a private single seat jet not being correctly serviced or supplied with in date munitions and the permit being withdrawn. The premise was that getting live bang seats permitted was very difficult and that live bang seats in the hands of civilian maintainers was not going to be easy - the Vulcan I took as an exception what with it being bigger and not single seat etc.

I made the - incorrect it now seems - assumption that - as the pilot of this Gnat did not eject that the seat was not live and or armed ... and I had - also incorrectly - assumed that these seats were inert in private hands.

But - there are indeed now reports that the seat was live and of the canopy having been blown off and perhaps the seat not having time to operate. It would also have been an early mark seat and perhaps not capable in the final manouver of this particular crash (captured on video) which appears to have been sharp with a high AOA (High G) and very close to the ground.
Also it seems that Gnat variant was not fitted with MB seats but had Folland's own version of an Ejection Seat.

Apologies for my assumptions - I now know different having researched .....

http://www.ejectorseats.co.uk/seat-regs.html
User avatar
Spitfire
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
 
Posts: 5188
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Hayle, SW Cornwall

Re: Gnat crashes at Car Fest

Postby Mayfly » Tue Aug 04, 2015 7:55 am

Correct the seat in the Gnat is a Follen seat not a MB, I believe it is based on Saab seat but not sure from what a/c.

I know not long after the RAF sold JPs some operators were flying them unarmed don't quote me but I'm almost sure the CAA made a ruling that if a PtoF a/c had ejection seats they had to be live. The only people I know who work on the seats are retired armours.

As an aside I'm sure I heard from somewhere this last week but not sure where that MB are to stop supplying spares for older seats ........ need to back track for that info.
In memory of a very dear friend - Mike Pearson

Very fond memories of Robbie Gilvary - DTs 1st Vulcan Captain who taught DT all he knew.
User avatar
Mayfly
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 29719
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: Bomber County


Return to Aviation Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests