558 "near miss"??

Discussions on XM655, XH558, XM607, XL426 or any other preserved aircraft

558 "near miss"??

Postby Jigsaw » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:58 am

I am not going to comment on the story in the link below. The media imo print their own interpretation of anything and it is usually bollox and written by ill informed prats.

http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/business/ ... -1-4886759
God created man because a vibrator can't mow the lawn!

User avatar
Boeing 747
Boeing 747
Posts: 6455
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Scunthorpe

Re: 558 "near miss"??

Postby Sooty655 » Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:25 am

I can't find the "report" on the Airprox Board website.

Here is an earlier one involving 558, scroll down to page 54.

Edit - Found it!!

Scroll down to page 4 of the report.

It might have only reached the Sheffield Star this week, but it was published in September last year.

One Olympus 301 has twice the power of a complete F1 starting grid.
XM655 has four of them, all serviceable.
When we make noise, WE MAKE NOIZE ! !
User avatar
Posts: 8822
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:17 pm
Location: Weedon, Northants

Return to Anything Vulcan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests