Upgrade to Image Handling

[Wedgy]

I've upgraded the software which handles images that are larger than IA (the zoom in and out functions etc). Not sure if anyone noticed, but they have been a little buggy over the last few months.

If anyone notices anything odd - post here

[Sooty655]

Sadly, it hasn't made any difference to my computer's inability to display Flikr links correctly.

The latest poster giving me the same trouble is Shrek.

[Jigsaw]

Sadly, it hasn't made any difference to my computer's inability to display Flikr links correctly.

The latest poster giving me the same trouble is Shrek.

It's no consolation mate but your not alone there.

[Wedgy]

What browsers are you both running?

[Jigsaw]

IE mate (69 I think)

[Sooty655]

Running IE8 on Windows XP on an HP Pavilion dv6500 laptop.

[Wedgy]

Have an old laptop running XP with IE8 and cannot see anything wrong with flickr posts.

What java version are you running?


(run command prompt 'java - version')

[Sooty655]

Java 6 Standard Edition update 24.

[MOD]

I've upgraded the software which handles images that are larger than IA (the zoom in and out functions etc). Not sure if anyone noticed, but they have been a little buggy over the last few months.

If anyone notices anything odd - post here

What's the max image size this site can handle?. I load from Photobucket at 1024x800(ish) and sometimes I get 2 'zoom in' +'s but usually only one will open.


ian

[Wedgy]

Java 6 Standard Edition update 24.

See what happens when you download the lastest version (update 30)
http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp

[Wedgy]

I've upgraded the software which handles images that are larger than IA (the zoom in and out functions etc). Not sure if anyone noticed, but they have been a little buggy over the last few months.

If anyone notices anything odd - post here

What's the max image size this site can handle?. I load from Photobucket at 1024x800(ish) and sometimes I get 2 'zoom in' +'s but usually only one will open.


ian

1024 x 1024 is the max - anymore and the screens full of scrollbars

[MOD]

I've upgraded the software which handles images that are larger than IA (the zoom in and out functions etc). Not sure if anyone noticed, but they have been a little buggy over the last few months.

If anyone notices anything odd - post here

What's the max image size this site can handle?. I load from Photobucket at 1024x800(ish) and sometimes I get 2 'zoom in' +'s but usually only one will open.


ian

1024 x 1024 is the max - anymore and the screens full of scrollbars

I'll try a 1024x1024 .. BTW is there any technical reason why my images definitely appear clearer on here than most other sites?

Ian

[Sooty655]

Java 6 Standard Edition update 24.

See what happens when you download the lastest version (update 30)
http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp

Just done that and it didn't make any difference.

Problem only happens if the post has the img codes buried within url codes. The pic are displayed overlaying each other and out of sync with any associated text.

[Dan4th]

BTW is there any technical reason why my images definitely appear clearer on here than most other sites?

It is because the Wedgemeister is such a
thoroughly decent and giving individual!

Right, Matt????????

Danf.

[Sooty655]

BTW is there any technical reason why my images definitely appear clearer on here than most other sites?

It is because the Wedgemeister is such a
thoroughly decent and giving individual!

Right, Matt????????

Danf.

Nah, it's because the wonderful Moderators are so careful to keep everything dusted and polished.

[RLN]

Can't leave it to the engineers..................................they just cover things in greaseand oil

[Xplumberlives]

Can't leave it to the engineers..................................they just cover things in greaseand oil :p

Is that a TRADE NAME?

[RLN]

Yep. Manufactured by a company called Fatfingers.

[Xplumberlives]

Yep. Manufactured by a company called Fatfingers.

Very Good!

[Sooty655]

Now I'm even more confused.

Last Lightning's pics here display fine, but Shrek's pics here are overlapping and messed up, but if I use my moderator's edit access to read the underlying code, I can't see the difference.

It doesn't make sense to me, but then these days very little does.

[Mayfly]

Sooty the only difference I can see when looking via the mod editing feature is LL has a space between his photos Shrek doesn't they are linked by a photo number, you could try putting a space in between the photos and see if that makes a difference.

[Sooty655]

Sooty the only difference I can see when looking via the mod editing feature is LL has a space between his photos Shrek doesn't they are linked by a photo number, you could try putting a space in between the photos and see if that makes a difference.

Tried that, MF. Doesn't make any difference.